Change is a constant in banking. Whether it’s rolling out a new digital banking platform, upgrading your core, or going through a merger, most banks today are in some stage of transformation. These projects are exciting, and they often promise efficiency, innovation, and better customer experience.
But big change also comes with big risk. And one of the most common oversights during these moments is leaving cybersecurity out of the early conversations.
Too often, cybersecurity teams are pulled in near the end and at that point, it’s much harder (and more expensive) to identify and fix security gaps.
To manage change effectively, cybersecurity needs a seat at the table from day one.
Every major change, whether operational or technological, introduces new access points, data connections, and dependencies. Without early planning, those changes can unintentionally expand your bank’s attack surface.
Some examples of risks that emerge when security isn’t involved early include:
In short, when cybersecurity isn’t looped in, visibility decreases and risk increases.
The best time to address security isn’t during the post-implementation audit — it’s during planning, design, and testing.
Not every change involves new technology. Sometimes it’s a process improvement or departmental restructure. But all change affects systems, people, or data in some way.
Here are a few examples where cyber oversight can make a big difference:
Each scenario brings operational benefits but also new exposure if controls aren’t assessed in advance. Recognizing that even “good change” carries cyber risk helps banks plan more intentionally.
You don’t need a dedicated change management system to keep projects secure. A few consistent practices can go a long way.
Formal governance ensures accountability. Even without a separate change management department, banks can build structure by:
When cybersecurity is embedded into governance, it becomes a natural part of decision-making and not an afterthought.
Regulators increasingly focus on how banks control change. The FFIEC Information Security Booklet states that changes to information systems should be “planned, authorized, tested, and approved prior to implementation.”
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF 2.0) echoes this by emphasizing governance and continuous improvement. Meanwhile, the GLBA Safeguards Rule expects institutions to adapt safeguards as systems evolve.
In short, regulators expect banks to demonstrate control. Consistency, documentation, and risk awareness are key, and constant improvements are important and necessary.
It’s easy to see cybersecurity as the “department of no.” But when engaged early, cybersecurity can actually help projects move faster and safer.
By identifying risks upfront, suggesting compensating controls, and aligning security goals with business objectives, cybersecurity becomes a strategic partner rather than an obstacle.
This shift in mindset builds trust across departments, strengthens regulatory confidence, and supports a more resilient organization overall.
Managing change isn’t about slowing progress; instead, it’s about ensuring progress happens securely.
Interested in strengthening how your institution manages change? Contact us to discuss how you can stay ahead of evolving threats and expectations.